Resources

Competency library

Experiment analysis competency by career level

Experiment analysis estimates what a controlled change caused by checking assignment, exposure, outcomes, uncertainty, and practical importance together.

Peasy HRPublished August 18, 2026Updated August 18, 2026

Short answer

Experiment analysis estimates what a controlled change caused by checking assignment, exposure, outcomes, uncertainty, and practical importance together.

About Experiment analysis

Experiment analysis analyzes controlled tests to estimate effects, uncertainty, and practical significance. It protects causal interpretation by checking design execution as well as the final estimate.

Use this competency for

  • Roles that design, validate, or analyze randomized product, marketing, or operational tests.
  • Work where a controlled comparison informs whether to launch, stop, or revise a change.

Do not use this competency for

  • Use statistical reasoning when the work is not centered on controlled experiments and their causal interpretation.

Important distinctions

Statistical reasoning

Statistical reasoning covers methods and uncertainty broadly, while experiment analysis focuses on controlled tests and causal effects.

Data analysis

Data analysis may describe differences in observed data, while experiment analysis checks whether a controlled change caused an outcome.

Expectations by level

IC1

IC1: Defined experiments

Analyzes a well-defined experiment with guidance using the approved assignment, exposure, and outcome definitions. Checks execution and reports effect and uncertainty.

Observable behaviors

  • Verifies sample counts, assignment balance, and experiment dates before reading outcomes.
  • Calculates the approved primary metric and uncertainty from the assigned groups.
  • Separates the planned result from exploratory cuts in the report.

Examples

  • Analyzes a checkout test, finds an assignment imbalance, and pauses interpretation until instrumentation is checked.
  • Reports a small conversion estimate with a wide interval and avoids declaring a winner.

IC2

IC2: Experiment decisions

Independently plans and analyzes team-level experiments with ambiguous tradeoffs. Defines decision criteria, diagnoses validity threats, and explains practical consequences.

Observable behaviors

  • Defines primary metrics, guardrails, unit of assignment, and analysis plan before results are known.
  • Checks exposure, attrition, interference, and repeated peeking for threats to interpretation.
  • Translates estimates and uncertainty into launch, iterate, or collect-more-data options.

Examples

  • Designs a notification test with user-level assignment to prevent messages crossing groups.
  • Finds that a pricing test changes refunds as well as purchases and presents both effects in the decision.

IC3

IC3: Experimentation standards

Sets experimentation methods used across teams and leads high-impact tests with complex assignment or long-term effects. Reviews whether causal claims match the design.

Observable behaviors

  • Defines shared standards for metric choice, power planning, validity checks, and result reporting.
  • Designs experiments for clustered assignment, network effects, or delayed outcomes.
  • Reviews portfolios of tests for conflicting treatments and repeated decision errors.

Examples

  • Creates an experimentation review that catches overlapping treatments before two teams launch.
  • Designs a region-level operations test and accounts for cluster variation in planning and analysis.

Build your competency framework

Add this competency to a Function and adapt the expectations to the scope and evidence your team needs.

Open the framework builder

Common questions

What does experiment analysis measure?

It measures how someone uses controlled tests to estimate causal effects, quantify uncertainty, and support a practical decision.

What evidence should managers use?

Use preregistered plans, assignment and exposure checks, analysis code, result reports, and decisions that reflect uncertainty and guardrails.

Is running a test enough?

No. The competency requires evidence that execution was valid and that the claim and decision match the estimated effect and its limits.

Related resources

Competency library

Data governance competency by career level

Data governance makes decisions about data rights, definitions, retention, and use explicit by assigning accountable owners and workable controls.

View competency

Competency library

Data analysis competency by career level

Data analysis turns a defined question into a defensible conclusion by selecting relevant data, checking limitations, and connecting findings to the decision at hand.

View competency

Glossary

Competency framework and review glossary

These are the words Peasy HR uses on purpose. People may search for a synonym such as competency matrix. We mention it, then use the preferred term.

Read guide
Experiment analysis competency expectations | Peasy HR