Resources

Competency library

Technical debt management competency by career level

Technical debt management assesses how technical constraints are evidenced, prioritized, and reduced according to delivery or operating impact.

Published by Peasy HRPublished August 18, 2026Updated August 18, 2026

Short answer

Technical debt management assesses how technical constraints are evidenced, prioritized, and reduced according to delivery or operating impact.

About Technical debt management

The ability to identify, prioritize, and reduce technical constraints that impede safe delivery, maintenance, or operation.

Use this competency for

  • Roles responsible for evolving code, systems, tooling, or operating practices over time.
  • Functions where accumulated constraints affect change cost, defects, or service operation.

Do not use this competency for

  • Work with no ownership of technical assets or influence over their future change.

Important distinctions

Code quality

Code quality assesses specific code and review standards. Technical debt management prioritizes accumulated constraints across competing work.

Delivery planning

Delivery planning sequences an outcome. Technical debt management decides which existing constraints warrant investment and how to reduce them safely.

Expectations by level

IC1

Individual contributor 1

Identifies a bounded technical constraint with guidance, records its impact, and improves it when the change fits the assigned scope.

Observable behaviors

  • Links a debt item to repeated work, risk, or failure evidence.
  • Avoids expanding a scoped fix into unrelated cleanup.
  • Leaves the touched area no harder to change than before.

Examples

  • Recorded a repeated manual step with examples and added a focused automation task.
  • Removed an obsolete branch while changing the same module and confirmed no callers remained.

IC2

Individual contributor 2

Independently prioritizes and reduces debt in a team-owned area, balancing current impact, change risk, and delivery needs.

Observable behaviors

  • Compares debt work using observable cost or risk.
  • Chooses an incremental reduction path for a risky constraint.
  • Checks whether completed work reduces the stated impact.

Examples

  • Sequenced replacement of a shared library behind an adapter instead of pausing feature work.
  • Prioritized a slow deployment step after measuring the engineer time it consumed each week.

IC3

Individual contributor 3

Sets debt reduction direction across teams for constraints with shared ownership and creates decision rules that keep investment tied to evidence.

Observable behaviors

  • Builds a cross-team view of constraints and affected outcomes.
  • Defines ownership and safe stages for shared debt reduction.
  • Retires debt items when evidence no longer supports the cost.

Examples

  • Coordinated removal of a legacy interface through compatible stages owned by several teams.
  • Created quarterly debt criteria based on incident risk, delivery delay, and maintenance effort.

Build with technical debt management

Add this competency to a Function, adapt the expectations to your work, and publish a fair standard your team can use.

Open the framework builder

Common questions

Is all old code technical debt?

No. Age alone is not evidence. A constraint should have a visible cost, risk, or limit on safe change.

Should teams reserve a fixed percentage for debt?

A fixed allocation can help planning, but ratings should reflect how people identify, prioritize, and reduce constraints using evidence.

How is this different from code quality?

Code quality assesses the standard of code changes. Technical debt management weighs accumulated constraints against other work over time.

Related resources

Competency library

Delivery planning competency by career level

Delivery planning assesses how technical outcomes become sequenced work with visible dependencies, risks, and checkpoints.

View competency

Competency library

Code quality competency by career level

Code quality defines the evidence that code is understandable, safe to change, and aligned with agreed engineering conventions.

View competency

Function template

Backend Engineering competency framework template

This Backend Engineering Function defines communication, ownership, service design, and delivery quality with evidence a manager can cite. Use it as a starting draft, then edit names, levels, and examples to match how your team actually works.

View template
Technical debt management competency expectations | Peasy HR